28 August 2007

When ideologues trash science...

When ideologues trash science and the scientific process it is not news. But when disseminators of scientific knowledge do it, it is appalling.

George W. Bush put pressure on NASA Scientists and our Nation's Surgeon General to tailor their results to fit his political agenda. Sad tidings for America, but thoroughly expected. One might even make the argument that it is just politics -- though our constitutionally-based democracy with it's protections for the minority makes this argument weak.

Then there are the science journal publishers -- you know, those top tier journals that the best academics donate their publishable work to: Nature, Science, etc. Last week the Association of American Publishers (whose membership includes hundreds of internationally acclaimed journals and societies) formed a lobbying group called PRISM to convince congress that open access (i.e. available to everyone, not just subscribers of their journals) to research results (which by the way is mostly funded by our taxes) is equivalent to government censorship. From the press release announcing the formation of the lobbying group:

Only by preserving the essential integrity of the peer-review process can we ensure that scientific and medical research remains accurate, authoritative, and free from manipulation and censorship and distinguishable from junk science.


There is an excellent rebuttal to the straw men set up in this press release here, so I won't go into too much detail, but let me first re-iterate the most critical issue: The journals piggy back on the peer-review process, they do not define it.

My biggest concern about the creation of PRISM is that lawmakers will consider the journal publishers in the highest regard. Who better to represent the scientific community than the journals that so many scientists regard in such high esteem and work day and night to get their work published in, right? WRONG! Journals are there to make money -- if they can make money publishing crap science, they would. Unfortunately, I'm afraid that lawmakers will say journal publishers = science therefore journals representatives represent good science policy.

3 comments:

streammm said...

When you infuse science with politics, of course, it defeats the purpose of politics altogether. But this is not just a problem with science these days; in general, there has been a profound erosion of what it means for something to be true. I blame Derrida.

Currently, our most hilarious examples are politically driven junk science are in health and nutrition. In principle, science moves forward, yet more and more people are super huge fat.

It's a great time to be a chubby chaser.

Madelia said...

Thanks for writing this.

Anonymous said...

Herzlich Willkommen in unseren Erotikchat.


Dieser Erotikchat bietet ihnen eine Möglichkeit gratis nackte frauen und vieles mehr,wie Blind Date
Hier im besten Erotikchat erwarten dich gratis nackte frauen Flirt und Sextalk
Suchst du Sexgeschichten , sicher bist du hier genau richtig.Ok los geht es,stellt sich die Frage,worauf wartest du?
sexuelle Vorlieben singels ,anmelden .
Suchst du jemand von Waadt, oder aus LudwigshafenamRhein, oder Heilbronn , oder von Ittigen, vieleicht von Kufstein? Mit Sicherheit ist jemand dabei.!